So have you ever been given a gift and tried to reject the gift because you knew that you would feel this pang in your mind that told you that you would now have to give a gift to that person? That right there is the norm of reciprocity. The norm of reciprocity states that we treat others as they have treated us--to the best of our abilities I would add (Gouldner, 1960). This norm of reciprocity is essentially the "Golden Rule" on the positive side of things and an "eye for an eye" on the negative.I feel like the norm of reciprocity is used most during the Christmas season. How often is it that during this time, someone gives you a gift and then you feel this compelling want to give them something in return? For me its pretty often. If anyone gives me a gift during Christmas or for my birthday I always feel compelled to get them something in return.
I've been a firm believer in the whole "you must give to receive" saying for most of my life, so this past Christmas I wanted to give gifts to a few friends knowing full well that by giving them the gift, they would feel compelled to get me something in return. Truth be told I wasn't really expecting something from all of them and wanted to give the gifts because they were really cool people. However, I still gave the gifts and indeed did get some gifts in return, which made me really happy.
Now that I've actually read about this technique and the others: the "foot-in-the-door," the "door in the face," and "that's not all" techniques (I'd only ever use low balling against someone I don't like), I feel like I can use them a lot more to make some gains. Especially for upcoming informational sessions I have to help out with or for collecting donations for Habitat for Humanity or Relay for Life. I could also very easily apply them at home more efficiently to get some gains. The tricks may be devious, but they're being used for a good cause in any situation that I would apply them.
References:
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
0 comments:
Post a Comment